
Considering response options
The task here isn't coding, but I think the user may just want a reply. If they ask about time, I should run a command, but since it's a statement here, I should clarify what they want. Should I confirm authenticity, details, or context? I can respond with "这条消息尚未被权威媒体证实" and also offer to verify if they provide context like a link. I’ll provide options for them to choose from: 1) 我要帮你核实多方来源 2) 整理尤里奇在亚特兰大的执教数据与解雇原因报道 3) 写一段新闻快讯/推文/群公告.Crafting a response strategy
I think I need to request approval to browse, but the default is network-enabled unless stated otherwise. I can ask the user if they want verification with the latest reports. Since my knowledge cutoff limits me, I should provide a concise response that acknowledges the claim, offers to verify it if they provide a link, and ask what they need.
I could suggest options like checking mainstream media or crafting a brief summary. I want to avoid misinformation and include a neutral template for reporting.Offering response formats
I think it would be helpful to ask the user which platform they prefer for the information. We can present options in different formats: maybe a longer summary, a brief note suitable for social media, or a group message.
So, I'll create a numbered list with three clear options for them to choose from. This way, I can ensure I meet their needs while sticking to the style guidelines. Let’s get that ready!
你是想确认这条消息的真伪,还是需要我整理成一段可转发的简讯/长文稿?
我的知识库不包含最新动态。需要的话我可以现在帮你核实多方来源(俱乐部官宣、权威媒体、舒拉/Nicolò Schira原帖)并给出清晰的时间线与出处。请确认是否需要我查证。

如果你要马上转发,用这段占位模板先顶上:
- 据多位意媒记者报道(含Nicolò Schira),亚特兰大已解雇主帅伊万-尤里奇。俱乐部尚未/已经发布官方声明,更多细节待更新。(来源:链接)
你想选哪种?
- 立即代查并给出权威来源与时间线
- 整理执教数据、解雇背景与可能接任人选的分析稿
- 生成不同平台的快讯文案(微博/朋友圈/群公告/推送)